Vermont
All Cases
5 Vermont Cases

Vermont
Apr 2025
Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Öztürk v. Trump
Whether someone with a valid visa within the U.S. can be arrested and detained on the basis of their political speech and advocacy.
Explore case
Vermont
Apr 2025

Free Speech
Immigrants' Rights
Öztürk v. Trump
Whether someone with a valid visa within the U.S. can be arrested and detained on the basis of their political speech and advocacy.

Vermont
Aug 2012
LGBTQ Rights
Baker and Linsley v. Wildflower Inn
Kate Linsley (formerly Baker) and Ming Linsley planned to marry in Vermont. After they got engaged, Ming's mother, Channie, took the lead in helping the couple find a venue for their reception. Like many mothers, she was ecstatic to have the opportunity to help her daughter and future daughter-in-law plan their celebration.
Explore case
Vermont
Aug 2012

LGBTQ Rights
Baker and Linsley v. Wildflower Inn
Kate Linsley (formerly Baker) and Ming Linsley planned to marry in Vermont. After they got engaged, Ming's mother, Channie, took the lead in helping the couple find a venue for their reception. Like many mothers, she was ecstatic to have the opportunity to help her daughter and future daughter-in-law plan their celebration.

Vermont
Sep 2011
Criminal Law Reform
In Re: Search Warrants
In June 2011, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Vermont and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a brief urging the Vermont Supreme Court to reject demands by local prosecutors to override warrant restrictions imposed by the court and allow a limitless search of a personal computer.
Explore case
Vermont
Sep 2011

Criminal Law Reform
In Re: Search Warrants
In June 2011, the ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ, ºìÐÓÊÓÆµ of Vermont and the Electronic Frontier Foundation filed a brief urging the Vermont Supreme Court to reject demands by local prosecutors to override warrant restrictions imposed by the court and allow a limitless search of a personal computer.

U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2008
Smart Justice
+4 Issues
Vermont v. Brillon
Whether delays caused by systemic deficiencies in a state's indigent defense system can ever be charged against the state in deciding whether a criminal defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. DECIDED
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Dec 2008

Smart Justice
+4 Issues
Vermont v. Brillon
Whether delays caused by systemic deficiencies in a state's indigent defense system can ever be charged against the state in deciding whether a criminal defendant has been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. DECIDED