红杏视频

BOSTON 鈥� A federal judge issued a preliminary injunction today after finding that an executive order by President Trump and a State Department policy prohibiting updates to sex designations on passports is likely unconstitutional and in violation of the law. The preliminary injunction requires the State Department to allow six transgender and nonbinary people to obtain passports with sex designations consistent with their gender identity while the lawsuit proceeds. Though today鈥檚 court order applies only to six of the plaintiffs in the case, the plaintiffs plan to quickly file a motion asking the court to certify a class of people affected by the State Department policy and to extend the preliminary injunction to that entire class. 鈥淭his decision is a critical victory against discrimination and for equal justice under the law,鈥� said Li Nowlin-Sohl, Senior Staff Attorney for the 红杏视频鈥檚 LGBTQ & HIV Project. 鈥淏ut it鈥檚 also a historic win in the fight against this administration鈥檚 efforts to drive transgender people out of public life. The State Department鈥檚 policy is a baseless barrier for transgender and intersex Americans and denies them the dignity we all deserve. We will do everything we can to ensure this order is extended to everyone affected by the administration鈥檚 misguided and unconstitutional policy so that we all have the freedom to be ourselves.鈥� 鈥淭his ruling affirms the inherent dignity of our clients, acknowledging the immediate and profound negative impact that the Trump administration's passport policy would have on their ability to travel for work, school, and family,鈥� said Jessie Rossman, Legal Director at 红杏视频 of Massachusetts. 鈥淏y forcing people to carry documents that directly contradict their identities, the Trump administration is attacking the very foundations of our right to privacy and the freedom to be ourselves. We will continue to fight to rescind this unlawful policy for everyone so that no one is placed in this untenable and unsafe position.鈥� On his first day in office in January 2025, Trump signed an executive order attempting to mandate discrimination against transgender people across the federal government and government programs. This included a directive to the Departments of State and Homeland Security 鈥渢o require that government-issued identification documents, including passports, visas, and Global Entry cards鈥� reflect their sex 鈥渁t conception.鈥� Under the ensuing Passport Policy, within 48 hours the State Department began holding some passports and other documents (such as birth certificates and court orders) submitted by transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people who had applied to update the sex designation on their U.S. passports and returning others with their applications rejected and their newly-issued passport marked with their sex assigned at birth. Over 214,000 public comments in opposition to the State Department鈥檚 new policy were collected by the 红杏视频 and Advocates for Transgender Equality. In February 2025, Orr v. Trump was filed by the 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Massachusetts, and Covington and Burling LLP, on behalf of seven people who have not been able to obtain passports that match who they are because of the State Department鈥檚 new Passport Policy or are likely to be impacted by the new policy upon their next renewal. The complaint was filed in the federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Whether the Department of Defense Education Activity can remove educational material related to race and gender from its libraries and classrooms in K-12 schools.

QUANTICO, Va. 鈥� Students in Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) schools on military bases sued today, arguing that DoDEA鈥檚 book removals and curricular changes following several executive orders from President Donald Trump violate their First Amendment rights. DoDEA operates 161 schools across 11 countries, seven states, Guam, and Puerto Rico. The suit was filed on behalf of 12 students from six families, ranging in age from pre-K to 11th grade, that attend DoDEA schools as children of active duty servicemembers stationed in Virginia, Kentucky, Italy, and Japan. Since January, their schools have systemically removed books, altered curricula, and canceled events that the government has accused of promoting 鈥済ender ideology鈥� or 鈥渄ivisive equity ideology.鈥� This has included materials about slavery, Native American history, LGBTQ identities and history, and preventing sexual harassment and abuse, as well as portions of the Advanced Placement (AP) Psychology curriculum. 鈥淟earning is a sacred and foundational right that is now being limited for students in DoDEA schools,鈥� said Natalie Tolley, a plaintiff on behalf of her three children in DoDEA schools. 鈥淭he implementation of these EOs, without any due process or parental or professional input, is a violation of our children's right to access information that prevents them from learning about their own histories, bodies, and identities. I have three daughters, and they, like all children, deserve access to books that both mirror their own life experiences and that act as windows that expose them to greater diversity. The administration has now made that verboten in DoDEA schools.鈥� In January 2025, President Donald Trump signed three executive orders which led to these removals: Executive Order (EO) 14168 titled 鈥淒efending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government鈥�; EO 14185 titled 鈥淩estoring America鈥檚 Fighting Force鈥�; and EO 14190 titled 鈥淓nding Radical Indoctrination in K-12 Schooling.鈥� The suit names Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and administrators of the DoDEA system, arguing that by revoking students鈥� access to books and curricula about race and gender, defendants are harming students鈥� First Amendment right to receive information. 鈥淪tudents in DoDEA schools, though they are members of military families, have the same First Amendment rights as all students,鈥� said Emerson Sykes, senior staff attorney with the 红杏视频鈥檚 Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. 鈥淟ike everyone else, they deserve classrooms where they are free to read, speak, and learn about themselves, their neighbors, and the world around them. These schools are some of the most diverse and high achieving in the nation, making it particularly insulting to strip their shelves of diverse books and erase women, LGBTQ people, and people of color from the curriculum to serve a political goal. Our clients deserve better, and the First Amendment demands it.鈥� The Department of Defense has also prohibited cultural awareness months, including Black History Month, Pride Month, Women鈥檚 History Month, and National Hispanic Heritage Month. Schools have also released guidance for yearbooks to prohibit students from using them to promote 鈥済ender ideology鈥� or 鈥渟ocial transition.鈥� Books banned within some DoDEA schools have reportedly included 鈥淭he Kite Runner鈥� by Khaled Hosseini; 鈥淔reckleface Strawberry鈥� by Julianne Moore; 鈥淗illbilly Elegy鈥� by Vice President JD Vance; 鈥淭he Antiracist Kid鈥� by Tiffany Jewell; and a preparation guide for the AP Psychology exam. 鈥淏y quarantining library books and whitewashing curricula in its civilian schools, the Department of Defense Education Activity is violating students鈥� First Amendment rights,鈥� said Matt Callahan, senior supervising attorney at the 红杏视频 of Virginia. 鈥淭he government can鈥檛 scrub references to race and gender from public school libraries and classrooms just because the Trump administration doesn鈥檛 like certain viewpoints on those topics.鈥� 鈥淥ur clients have a right to receive an education that includes an open and honest dialogue about America鈥檚 history,鈥� said Corey Shapiro, legal director for the 红杏视频 of Kentucky. 鈥淐ensoring books and canceling assignments about the contributions of Black Americans is not only wrong, but antithetical to our First Amendment rights.鈥� The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia by the 红杏视频, the 红杏视频 of Virginia, and the 红杏视频 of Kentucky. The complaint can be viewed here: https://www.aclu-ky.org/sites/default/files/field_documents/ek_v_dodea_-_2025.04.15_ecf_001_-_complaint.pdf

Local library patrons, with help from the 红杏视频 and 红杏视频 of South Carolina, are suing officials in South Carolina鈥檚 most populous county for systematically purging literature by and about lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) people from its public library collection.